there has been real resistance and excuses about how different types of businesses/organisation work.
forgot to add, thing is, this is totally true.
when i first started working after uni, and friends/relatives started sharing more about how their workplace functions.. i was a bit naive about how different each job is!
some examples off the top of my head:
family member is a self employed tradesman - norm is to be a company director, pay yourself national minimum wage, benefit from the divadend payouts as "profit" (all legit)
another friend is a nanny, she's on some wierd contract where she talks about her NET pay not gross - no one mentioned that to me about how nannies work!
another friend's son is an employed contractor at a large corporate/global company, they get paid every 4 weeks (yes, 4th week, not monthly, despite being a normal office job) and it's via an umbrella company where the umbrella takes a fee every payroll for providing basic services
then there's me in a bog standard boring normal salaried job 
neighbour is a hair dresser who "rents" her chair from the salan, she pays a basic fee plus card terminal bank fees but then she keeps the rest of the "profit" and i guess this makes her self employed?
hair dresser's husband is an employed tradesman but he has to buy his own tools (for work!), pays for his accommodation himself if he works away, and doesn't even really get anything other than the basic sick pay despite working in dangerous conditions, it's crap.
so yes, i think your statement (even if it's coming from a partner you can't trust) is totally accurate.