They left a message asking me to ring them back regarding a letter on issue to me. I did so yesterday.
Basically, they told me that my CSA case will be closing and I have two choices. Did i want my case to transition to CMS or did i want to write of the debt (around a grand).
Now, I've had CSA case opened from when DD was born but payment has always been inconsistent due to my ex being between jobs and claiming to be self employed then claiming benefits etc. He had a deduction of earnings order for the times he was in employment. I'm not sure what happened but about three or four years ago i stopped receiving any money and didn't bother to chase it up.
I don't like the idea off writing of his debt. I'd be happy for them to try and get it from him. Even if he only has to pay the flat rate of £5 a week. It's the principle, I guess. However, I'm a bit worried about how the new service works. Can anybody help alleviate my fears?
I want to instantly go for the collected pay option. I'm happy to pay the £20 application fee and the 4% collection costs. There was abuse in the relationship and we have had no contact for over a decade. However, this abuse was never reported or documented. It's basically my word against his.
I'm concerned that they will try to get me to come to an arrangement with him directly first. Would that be the case?
What if they manage to find him and he chose one option (e.g. to pay directly into my account) but I chose another (e.g. for them to collect the money then transfer into my account) - whose choice would be honoured?
I believe it would be cheaper for him to pay me directly as there would be an additional 20% cost added on if the CMS need to collect it from him. Therefore, he would likely want to go for the cheaper option.
I don't want him having any of my details and would only agree to pursuing maintenance if CMS were the middle men.
Can anybody share their experience of this? Who choice for payment would be honoured if both parents choose different options?