stars - the general thinking is it is not worth using a lump sum to pay for uni unless the student also has additional means to pay for a house deposit. So if there is enough to pay for uni and a deposit, fine, but otherwise saving the money for a deposit seems wise, else the deposit can take years to build.
The repayments on loans are 9% of salary above 21k, which could change I know, but is basically equal to about £70/month on a salary of 30k.
Say the child uses the lump sum for uni, so has no debts. S/he will be better off by £810/yr with no loan repayments on the above salary. But even if that is put straight into a deposit fund, how many years will it then take to build up a decent deposit? 10+ yrs for 10k, assuming no other spare money.
Given that a mortgage is generally cheaper than renting, esp with a decent deposit, it seems a no brainer for the lump sum to be used for a deposit and the loan to be repaid.
This is the stance we are taking with our DC and their inheritences, I would rather see them settled in their own homes at a young age, rather than renting for years. Even if it does mean they also have student loans to pay off.
Obviously if the terms of student loans change considerably, we may re-consider that stance, or help them reduce them with our own money.
There are many that dont agree with this stance, the HE forum is full of people saying don't take loans out under sny circumstances. But I think most of those must be rich enough to cover the uni costs and provide a house deposit (or DC have latter already).