we had a full survey done when we bought our current home. This was done in Nov 2003, we moved in in Feb 2004 so it is all quite a while ago. The survey was positively glowing about the condition of the house so we didn't negotiate price after our offer was accepted.
When we moved in we realised surveyor might as well have done the survey from outside the house and accross the road (in fact thats what we suspect may actually have happened) so many things weren't mentioned. SOme quite minor, some potentially more serious.
Anyway, to (try to) cut a long story short we've been in (sporadic it has to be said) communication with the surveying company who said they had sacked that surveyor shortly after the date our survey was done. The head of the firm came around and agreed the survey wasn't up to scratch and offered a refund. This didn't seem fair to me so I suggested a refund and paying another firm (unbiased) to do another report. After all we bought the bloody house on the strength of this firm's incompetent surveyor's report. Initially he said yes but then we got a letter saying no, they'd refund and do another themselves (so completely biased against showing anything problemmatic) but then another letter came saying refund only and in full and final settlement, which I believe means we would ave no recourse against the surveyors if anything were to emerge with the house that they should have spotted. Again to me this seems outrageously unfair.
Does anyone have any ideas on what to do? Ideally I would like the price of the survey refunded but not in full and final settlement. Do I need to go to the small claims court or something?
anyone know the length of time a survey is "good" for legally anyway?
I suppose I should go to a solicitor but I am loathe to spend more cash on this...although at this stage I will if I have to just for the principle of the thing