Last weekend went to Argos and bought a vacuum cleaner. It was a well known brand and cost £100. I bought it mainly cos it had a hepa filter and as DS has asthma I wanted a good vacuum cleaner.
Anyway took it out of it's box and I was surprised at how flimsy and tacky the plastic was. I decided to use it as looks can be deceptive. It was not very good at sucking up and what I really disliked was there was a ton of dirt on the head (static I guess) which you would need to vacuum off but there was no appropriate head supplied.
DP took it back to Argos and they said that as we used it their 30 day refund policy didn't apply and the product was not faulty. The woman even argued that her vacuum did the same thing.
I looked up trading standards and according to them you can expect goods to be:
Of satisfactory quality.
This means the goods must meet the standards that any reasonable person would expect, taking into account the description, the price and all other relevant information. In some circumstances, the retailer may be liable for any statement made by the manufacturer about the goods.
Satisfactory quality includes the appearance and finish of the goods, their safety and durability and whether they are free from defects (including minor faults)
Fit for the purpose
that goods of this type are generally sold. They must also be fit for any specific or particular purpose made known to the seller at the time of the agreement.
As described
- goods should correspond with any description applied to them.
Do you think we should go back there and argue that the above?????