i wouldnt mind a general consensus on what you guys think
someone i know is making a med neg claim and has to decide when he thinks the negligence occured, as you have 3 yrs from the day you think the negligence started ti make a claim. His initial injury was in aug o3, but he didnt get anything other than physio until june 05 , and hten had to wait unitl jan 06 to have surgery.
i think until he was given a diagnosis he would be unaware there was negligence because he wouldn't have known what the correct procedure should have been until then,and should give the june 05 date instead of that date of the actual initial injury
is this correct do you think?