Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

By to Let and Tax Implications

2 replies

BlueThursday · 23/06/2013 14:50

Hi there, long time lurker seeking some advice please.

DH and I have a mortgage for which I get a staff rate. For this my tax allowance is greatly reduced. My DH, however, has a generous tax allowance due to doing uniform laundry and such like.

We are thinking of converting our current home into a BTL and buying another home for ourselves. Would it be worthwhile staying with my employer for this plus new mortgage or will my BIK become too great and hammer my tax?

Also, would it be best to have everything in my name for any potential BTL to keep DHs salary optimised ie not fall into 40% tax bracket?

Thanks in advance!

OP posts:
riksti · 23/06/2013 14:57

Definitely better to have it all in your name if your husband is close to 40% bracket and you are not.

If you have a low interest loan from your employer and use it for a BTL property the loan won't actually become a benefit in kind. there is a section in the legislation that states that where the interest would be fully deductible against income (which it would be as a BTL interest) then no benefit is due. I'm not sure what information your employer needs to ensure they don't need to enter it on the P11d, though.

BlueThursday · 23/06/2013 15:07

Appreciated thanks :)

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread