Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Mortgage without marriage

7 replies

TeaSippingPterodactyl · 23/08/2011 18:03

Am hoping someone can help.My friend has been in a relationship though not married,for 15 years.She has a joint mortgage with her partner,and he was always happy for her to work part time and look after the house,garden, dogs etc whilst he paid the mortgage and went out to work.I must stress that they were both happy with this arrangement. Her partner has recently announced that he has met someone else and wants to move on. She has a joint mortgage with her partner,and I was sure this meant that she is entitled to half of the proceeds but he has stated that as he has paid the lion's share, he is legally entitled to a larger percentage than her. Can anyone please help me put her mind at rest?

OP posts:
HeidiHole · 23/08/2011 18:08

I believe (though just my opinion) that if you have a joint mortgage and joint ownership at land registry then you are entitled to half

Who actually 'paid' is utterly irrelevant. Your friend should get half the house.

ginmakesitallok · 23/08/2011 18:09

If they have joint title to the house then she is entitled to half

beanlet · 23/08/2011 18:10

Cross post in legal.

TeaSippingPterodactyl · 23/08/2011 18:12

Thankyou-tis as I thought and she will be mighty relieved!

OP posts:
TeaSippingPterodactyl · 23/08/2011 18:13

Will do Beanlet ,thanks.

OP posts:
EvaAnna · 24/08/2011 11:27

Remember, joint mortgage doesn't initially mean joint ownership - she needs to be registered with land registry as joint owner. If so, she is entitled to half.

niceguy2 · 24/08/2011 19:50

Technically she's entitled to half since she's joint tenants.

However, if he has contributed a lot more then he could take the matter to court. I doubt he'd get much more and it'd probably cost him more in fees than he'd get so it's going to be a hell of a gamble for him.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page