Well this is probably a rant more than anything but I visited 3 banks this morning with my 13 year old to open a bank account for him and still don't have one.
LloydsTSB said, sorry we're too busy but can fit you in next week (I work in the week so no go); Nationwide said 'no problem I'll get you a form', then comes back and says 'sorry we've run out of forms but you can go to our other branch 3 miles away' and finally Natwest.
Well, Natwest was a total joke and I'm fuming. They asked for ID and proof of address so I gave them mine and DS passports, plus a letter from HMRC Child Benefit and a letter from the Premium Bonds people, both addressed to me but referring to DS. They said they couldn't accept the letters as they referred to DS forename only and our surnames are different. Also, as child benefit can be paid to a guardian it didn't prove that DS was mine!!! Then they asked for his birth certificate (which I couldn't find this morning) showing my name. I pointed out that I have a different surname to the one on the certificate after I remarried so that would be no more useful than the documents I gave them. So, they asked for a copy of my marriage certificate (!) showing my old name so I could 'prove' the link between us.
Obviously I wasn't expecting to have to produce my marriage certificate for a child's bank account so I didn't have it with me! Natwest refused to open the account without it.
I have told my son that I will buy him a tin with a lid to keep his money in.
No bloody wonder the banking system is on its knees when it won't open an account for a child with the correct paperwork and a couple of hundred quid deposit!
I was made to feel like a criminal / money launderer. I don't know why there needs to be a 'link' between me and DS, what if I was his guardian would that mean he wasn't allowed a bank account? Do they want a DNA sample before they'll do it??
Frustrating.