Poverty Thresholds 2003
----------------
(Use landscape & legal printer options to print this table) Poverty Thresholds for 2003 by Size of Family and Number of Related Children Under 18 Years
(Dollars)
Weighted Related children under 18 years
Size of family unit average Eight
thresholds None One Two Three Four Five Six Seven or more
One person (unrelated individual).?????????? 9,393
Under 65 years....................??????????? 9,573 9,573
65 years and over.................??????????? 8,825 8,825
Two persons.........................?????????.. 12,015
Householder under 65 years........?????????. 12,384 12,321 12,682
Householder 65 years and over...?????????. 11,133 11,122 12,634
Three persons.......................??? 14,680 14,393 14,810 14,824
Four persons........................???. 18,810 18,979 19,289 18,660 18,725
Five persons........................???????????.. 22,245 22,887 23,220 22,509 21,959 21,623
Six persons.........................??????????.. 25,122 26,324 26,429 25,884 25,362 24,586 24,126
Seven persons.......................???? 28,544 30,289 30,479 29,827 29,372 28,526 27,538 26,454
Eight persons.......................??????????. 31,589 33,876 34,175 33,560 33,021 32,256 31,286 30,275 30,019
Nine persons or more................???. 37,656 40,751 40,948 40,404 39,947 39,196 38,163 37,229 36,998 35,572
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey 2004 Annual Social and Economic Supplement.
So we're on the poverty line but only just, lots of people fall well below us I know. I think the problem is that with the way benefits are worked, if you fall on the line you tend to just miss out on lots of benefits: we actually had much more income when DH was redundant (sick but didn't claim for that), and I was on £100 may leave. And of course, we had no work expenses such as petrol.