Hi everyone,
My history is a 20 week loss in January, a 7 week loss in May and an 11 week loss 2 weeks ago so I know how really unremittingly awful this is.....
If I was you, I would wait to TTC and PUSH LIKE MAD for a clotting test as soon as possible. If you have the money go to st marys or st thomas RMC in london as a private patient.
As Confuddled rightly says, if you have got a clotting issue, you will need clexane as well as aspirin. Like her i've been in the position of trying to get a clexane prescription out of a consultant urgently when in early pregnancy, and its tough going.
I eventually got in to see one at 8+2 during my last PG and she immediatley prescribed and i started on it that day. A later scan showed the baby had died 3-5 days before this, while i was phoning around trying to get the stuff.
Although there is no way to 'rush' through the clotting diagnosis because you HAVE to test positively on two different occasions AT LEAST 8 weeks apart in order to be officially diagnosed, in my experience once i'd got the first positive test they sent my gp a letter saying whilst they were waiting for the second test window, the gp should prescribe me clexane anyway if i got pregnant beforehand as a safety measure, so the first test should get it for you if you need it.
The reason i'd be keen to test is because of the dates of your MC's, particularly the first one. Lesley Regan (head of st mary's rmc) says in her book that she thinks the whole three trimester thing is medically outdated- the idea that if you lose before 13 weeks it is a 'normal' miscarriage is wrong because in her experience, the actual cut off for a 'normal' miscarriage is prior to the heartbeat being seen on a scan.
She says that most MC of a chromosomal variety occur before 7 weeks, and if the baby has been observed as having a hearbeat at this stage, it is likely that an external factor has acted upon the baby to end the preganancy, like clotting or infection, and so a loss after this should be considered highly significant.
She says medically there is a HUGE difference between a pregnancy that starts MC at seven weeks (that might have only actually developed to 4/5 weeks) and a pregnancy that has developed to the seven week stage. So your first PG would fall into that- second one sounds like it might have been a 'normal' (sorry i hate the way they use that word for this' chromosomal MC, and the third one depends on when it developed to, iyswim. The first one would definitely raise red flags.
Also, I know exactly what you mean about running out of time. I'm 38, have no living dc's....its all i think about.
Confuddled your story gave me some much needed hope today. Trying to psyche myself up to TTC again for the fourth time, hoping it will be different with early clexane. Thank you.