@potas I think you should carry on. your periods stopped early 40s that's classed as early menopause and you will have been without estrogen for a good few years early= risk to your bones and heart health, longer term.
However....
if this is HRT from your GP they tend to prescribe 'bog standard' using GP guidance rules which don't allow for variations that you could be offered from a meno consultant or outside NHS prescribing.
You've been offered 'bog standard' for someone post menopause.
It's often better to start on sequential/cyclical HRT because this is only estrogen for a few weeks and you can get that dose right. I was much older than you when I started HRT . But I was started on estrogen gel only for 10 weeks to get that dose right, before adding in a progesterone. I was still in peri so there wasn't a risk to my womb to be without progesterone for those weeks.
I started low- half a pump- and worked up to 2 pumps (same as 50mcgs patch.)
I'm still in sequential, years later, out of choice.
I'd suggest you ask if you can try sequential for 6 months and see how that goes. your GP may be reluctant - going by the 'rules' on it must be continuous, but this isn't actually true. (I know women in their 70s still on HRT using it on a cycle, out of choice.)
You might also want to swap from patches to gel because you can change the dose yourself (up) without a new prescription (as with patches.)
And you'd take Utrogestan for 12 days per month. Yes, you'd have a light bleed each month but it may be better than weight gain and not feeling any better. The progesterone in patches is the old type, whereas Utrogestan (micronised progesterone) is body-identical. It's trial and error which suits you best.
if your GP isn't up to speed, can you stretch to a private consultation with a meno specialist?