@monkfruitmartini I thought from the posts here that some women were asking for a thread devoted entirely to options that weren't HRT. Maybe that isn't the case but it is why I signposted the MM forum (where I know women asked for a section just for that.)
If women have none or very few symptoms, they don't need HRT unless their family history or risk factors show they should use it for prevention of osteoporosis.
Sadly, despite 1:2 women over 50 having a fracture = osteoporosis, the NHS doesn't offer preventative screening. It's something the ROS has campaigned for recently as the cost of broken bones/disability/long term care/death exceeds the cost of a scan.
15% of women have no symptoms. In my own small circle of friends, the two with no symptoms ever have had fractures in their early 60s and have osteo.
Around 75% of women do have symptoms. There is a disparity between the number on HRT and yet putting up with symptoms.
There are a group of women who can't take HRT for medical reasons There are very few reasons and they need to talk to a specialist not a forum.
Many others who 'think' they can't often because of misinformation are denying themselves treatment with HRT because of that. This is what @DrZaraCarmichael said in her post. Women need correct information (eg on this thread there are women who think HRT=more periods etc).
It's not 'pushing' HRT to share factual information (links and quotes from medical sources aren't personal opinions) which may help them then they can make up their own minds.
Sorry this is so long but I wanted to explain 😀