The figures are per 1000 women, over 5 years.
So that would be 8 to 10 more per 1000 women over 5 years.
(Based on the older types of progesterone, which you may or may not be using.)
10 in a 1000 is an increase of an additional 1% in 5 years (not each year.)
A lot of the data that is used is meta data (adding together ALL data over many
years) some of which is now proved to be flawed and it's based on the older types of progestins.
The other information - which is what many experts now believe- is that HRT promotes the growth of an existing cancer, not cause it. And that it would have developed anyway. This is in the first link too, by Dr Currie.
Maybe ask yourself why you went on HRT, have a 3 month trial without it to see how you are and if you still have symptoms.
Also look at your family history and consider if HRT might be preventing some diseases like osteoporosis, diabetes, colon cancer (which HRT protects against) and make a judgement on risks and benefits for you.
If you want to carry on, swap to Utrogestan perhaps and consider a sequential type (monthly cycles) as the combined continuous type has a higher risk (both hormones daily.)
It's not an easy decision, I appreciate that.