It's very unprofessional for doctors to criticise other doctors, openly, in the media. I'd steer away from any doctor who did that.
I am sceptical of some of the quotes here from other medical professionals and they are really sticking their necks IF they knew their words would be used in this context.
It's interesting that none of the 'top names' in menopause gynaecologists has added their comments to this article. There is a quote from Paula Briggs of the BMS but did she know she was being asked to comment on Newson Health?
Because it's not clear if they have been asked specifically to comment on Dr Newson, or rather asked to comment generally on the use of high doses.
It's very easy for a journalist to have an interview with someone - here, a doctor- ask them questions that appear to be 'innocent' and about general prescribing guidance, but not tell them that their quotes are going to be used in this context- against a named doctor.
You end up with a mish-mash of quotes, aimed at building a case against someone, when those quotes may have been given months or years ago, (innocently) in a different context.
The Mail has an agenda and they have aimed to build a case against someone. It's a bit like making a film where various shots are taken at different times and locations, then all joined together 'seamlessly' to create a version of reality.
I'm not saying there is no concern over high doses, but this isn't the best way to approach it.