As a very post menopausal woman I'm on the fence about this. The Menopause is a pain in the bum but it doesn't kill people. Many of its symptoms overlap into other areas including well-being as it often hits at the same timenas children leave home, aged parents die, looks begin to fade etc.
I had a peri test at 43. It was negative although I was having large gaps. Hot flushes started at about 45. I went on HRT aged 47. Last period at 48/49 but stayed on HRT for a while. GP initially prescribed something pedestrian. I had an apt with a gynaecologist for something else and he prescribed something more tailored to me.
Meanwhile I was diagnosed with severe osteoporosis (I suspect due, as well as a family history, to struggling with undiagnosed graves for about two years in my late 20s - symptoms dismissed by GP). Since then my GP refused initially to refer me to a specialist after fracturing a vertebrae subsequent to diagnosis (it was the private consultant who hooked me up with possibly the best rheumatologist in the country - NHS). On fracturing the second the GP refused to believe it was fractured and diagnosis was achieved privately. When rheumatologist ventured the best treatment, subsequent to a course of zolendronate, was teriparatide, it became clear that this was not findable under the NHS because I am under 65. I am therefore funding it myself. I note I still work full-time and contribute to the NHS via tax and NI. I note further that I find it extraordinary that Dr's claim Nice is a guideline and doesn't have to be followed. Regarding reducing a distal radius fracture NICE says G&A is insufficient but many hospitals do it with just G&A. Regarding teriparatide at under 65 providers follow the guideline to the letter. It's incredulous to think the guidelines can be ignored when it saves money but not when money needs to be spent.
I have not found GP services to be particularly helpful over the last 40 years and I do not find as a patient I am treated as an equal stakeholder.
I am afraid I believe there are far more serious diseases that kill that need to take priority over the menopause.
It seems to me it is time to be realistic about what the NHS can and cannot do and very transparent about what it offers. If people want more than the minimum SLA provides then I think we have reached a point where that needs to be provided for through alternative means. I would fully support a system of social insurance as they have in Continental Europe.
Overall I'd like to see a little more integrity in the NHS and a little more respect for patients. If I were to continually complain to my key stakeholders that I was overworked and exhausted despite earning six figures and it was the fault of my Employer, my clients would rightly complain and I would lose my job. If I used my clients first names whilst expecting them to address me with a title I'd be dismissed for insubordination.
Something has gone deeply and badly wrong and I don't think it's the fault of governments or the public rather that the NHS has been allowed to become an over bureaucratic behemoth that wishes to dictate without being accountable and has lost its sense of service to the public who receive it free only at the point of delivery. The NHS exists for the public who need both to stop being grateful for suboptimal standards whilst also being realistic.
Apologies for length of post and typos.