Due to a high risk of ovarian cancer, at (nearly) 44 I'm in discussions with my doctors about best prevention methods. I'm fairly sure I'm going to go with just overy removal - with the possible risks and complications I don't think getting rid of my uterus and cervix is really necessary.
However, keeping my uterus without overies brings other issues - I need to have progestogen to protect the lining of my uterus from overgrowing and developing precancerous and cancerous changes.
One doctor has recommended the Mirena coil, fitted at the same time as the surgery to remove my overies.
I'd use patches for the oestrogen to complete my HRT needs.
My dilemma is that I have read up on the possible negative side affects of the Mirina coil, and I really don't want these as the affects from surgical menopause will probably be brutal enough!
So, do I look / ask for another progestogen delivery method, do I remove my uterus and not have these issues (but take the risk on vaginal prolapse, loss or change of orgasam, bigger op, longer recovery time, blah), or try the coil and see what happens?
I'm info overloaded but with no female relatives / friends to get a personal perspective from I'm really hoping someone with any rl experience with the coil / surgical menopause, or anything else they think relevant, could give me their opinion / experience I'd really appreciate it.
Don't know if this is relevant, but just in case; I'm married (v supportive and understanding DH) and no kids (by choice).
Thanks for reading 