agree that these types of petitions do more ahrm than good - there has to be evidence ...
when it comes to emotional abuse it IS about perception - bullying, harasssment - the definitions come back to the victim -not the abuser:
Definition
Bullying among children is understood as repeated, negative acts committed by one or more children against another. These negative acts may be physical or verbal in nature for example, hitting or kicking, teasing or taunting or they may involve indirect actions such as manipulating friendships or purposely excluding other children from activities. Implicit in this definition is an imbalance in real or perceived power between the bully and victim.
ojjdp.ncjrs.org/jjbulletin/9804/bullying2.html
harassment - Harassment
Employment context:-
Any unwanted or uninvited behaviour which is offensive, embarrassing, intimidating or humiliating.
unwanted or uninvited - it is the "victim" who gets to decide.
www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/C/CriminalHarassment.aspx
Whoever willfully and maliciously engages in a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, shall be guilty of the crime of criminal harassment....
"which seriously alarms that person"
if the child is "seriously alarmed" shows signs eg bedwetting - that has to be taken seriously.
if the adult involved appreciates their actions have impact, they will seek to change that if they are made aware. if they do not, then they have the problem - not the victim.
i have been advised by CAFCASS to suggest to my child that she at 9 "manages her dad's behaviour" herself by talking to him about it....it is a lot to ask of a child.
i found it so hard myself - so i left him... was unable to -how can one expect that of a child?