We split in Feb and have a private arrangement where he sees DD an afternoon in the week and Sundays. Whenever he asks to see her outside of the agreed times, I accommodate when possible (most of the time). I am about to start a job (I have been freelancing and working from home since she was born but commissions have seriously dried up thanks to the recession) and have arranged for DD to go to a childminder. One shift I will be working is until 10pm and childminder has agreed to have her. But xp thinks he should have her, which would be fine, except he is unreliable (has turned up late, and not at all before, says he will look after DD, then says he can't at the last minute etc). I know that he would make my life hell saying he could/couldn't have DD if I was relying on him to have her when I worked the late shift, and I told him this was the reason she was going to the childminder. He, of course, thinks he is the model nrp, and didn't see my point. Anyway, he's pissed off about it, but even more pissed off that, with tax credits and my income, I will be earning 'as much as him' (nice man, doesn't think about it being better for DD if I've got more money coming in). Anyway, seeing as he's on 23K and I'll be earning 5K, he doesn't have a mortgage and I do, were not exactly going to be in the same league , but he is now saying he's going to cut his hours and go on benefits next year because he 'won't be much worse off'. The implication also being that he'll be cutting the maintenance he gives me for DD. He is also saying that by that time he'll have 'applied for and received 50% custody'. This is all in one (text) conversation tonight and it's pretty obvious he's been drinking (well, it's guaranteed actually, seeing as he gets pissed every night). I told him to call me tomorrow when he's sober to tell me all about what his solicitor said. I don't believe for a minute he's seen a solicitor, I can't see him putting his hand in his pocket to pay a solicitor and take me to court (because that's what it would come to if he tried it). Do solicitors use terms like 'custody'?
And, on the other matter, can he just claim benefits because he has requested to go part time for no good reason? I can just see him saying to the benefits officer, 'Well, my xp only works x hours and gets x benefits, so I thought I'd do the same as I do hate to think she's getting more from the state than I am.' Oh, and he's also annoyed that I'm doing an OU degree in order to retrain as a teacher so that when DD reaches school age, I'll be working school hours. He denies this and says he'll support me. So far, his 'support' has been to refuse to look after DD for two hours in the evening once a month to enable me to attend tutorials. So, like I said, nice guy.