I just read another thread that prompted this.
Going to try to give as much context as needed without too much detail.
Ex and I both lost custody 7 years ago due to his abuse. Took 5 years for me to get them home but I did it.
He was offered (when we where signed off 9 months ago) to have contact on a supervised basis at his cost via private arrangement, child in need plan to get it in place. He said he couldn't afford it. So they no longer see him (and are fine).
I'm currently working part time (16 hours) due to my eldests serious mental health issues over the last year and keeping her 2 siblings stable. So I'm getting topped up by UC (though I am very very lucky that my wage on PT hours about the same as full time hours for someone on min wage).
We get by, and I've had a certain pride in that. However would we be significantly better off if I chased him for CMS?
My understanding is it wouldn't change the fact he would need to pay for access to see them supervised. Part of it might be just my bitterness against him deciding to not bother with contact when he pays nothing towards them.
I'll likely just leave things be, do my damn best to give them everything they need and leave it at that. But if I DID chase him... would I be any better off? 2 years back payment however I was working full time for a year of that, then part time abs UC too ups throughout so not sure if it would just even out?