Hi there,
Just looking for a bit of advice if there's anyone in a similar situation. Very aware this could come across as bragging about income but it's not intended at all.
I've a single parent to my DS and don't have a great relationship with exH. Contact is split 65% (me) / 35% (him) via a court order but he's on a bit of a power trip about making sure he is seen as the "main parent" - was very controlling with me when we were together, no concerns about DS but if there's a chance to make my life awkward or stamp his authority he will do it!
Anyway, I currently work 'reduced hours' and earn c. £48k so I'm eligible for child benefit as it's under the £50k threshold. However, I'm thinking of going full time and my salary would increase by 20% taking me over the £50k limit for child benefit.
I've heard in the past that one of the factors taken into account when defining the 'resident parent' is who receives the child benefit (as well as the split of custody).
I appreciate that I'm lucky to be in the financial position I'm in and would be happy to sacrifice my child benefit payment if my salary increase means I (quite rightly) no longer qualify. However, I don't want to do this if it means it will weaken my position as RP??
I'm obviously the resident parent just now with 65% custody but if my exH was to go for 50/50 contact in the future would this make it harder for me to demonstrate my case?
If so, I'd consider remaining on my reduced hours contract?
Alternatively, a friend said to me that if you earn over £50k you can still claim child benefit but fill in an self assessment and pay higher rate tax on it. I'd happily pay the tax and even donate to charity as I'd feel guilty claiming a benefit I don't technically need.
Does anyone have any experience of this?