I have 50/50 on a 2/2/3 pattern. Mondays and Tuesdays with me. Wednesdays and Thursdays with their Mum. And we alternate weekends. Which means that the longest the kids are away from either of us is 5 days. We considered a week on, week off pattern, but the kids felt that was too long apart from either of us.
Not sure the pattern of moving every 2-3 days is great - the 2/2/3 means that in any given week, the kids will spend 2 days with one parent, and 5 with the other. So it is less upheaval than moving every 2-3 days.
2/2/3 works for us and - most importantly - for the kids. We live about a mile apart. Both houses are homes for the kids, and they have everything they need at both houses. So they aren't moving lots of stuff between the houses.
Personally, I'm a huge fan of 50/50. So long as it's practical, it is hugely beneficial to the children to maintain a close relationship with both parents. With the best will in the world, a parent who has the kids only EOW really isn't in touch with their lives in the same way. And no parent who wants to maintain a close relationship with their kids, and is therefore seeking 50/50, would accept EOW as an alternative - would you?
I don't think a 30 minute trip to school is the end of the world, and there's no need to move. My girls have a 25 minute bus ride to the local secondary school, and even the walk to the local primary took 15 minutes. So a journey of that length to get to school isn't unusual or a problem.
I don't really buy the control argument (and I say that as someone whose ex wife was controlling, jealous, suffered terrible rages, and was even violent). 50/50 offers no more or less scope for control than any other pattern. My ex and I have little to do with one another, and when we are on our own time, we parent on our own terms.
Hope that helps you a little.