I've been trying to get Ds1's father to visit, no strings, whatever, for about 2 1/2 years now. Ds1 is nearly four. I never get an answer to my friendly messages. I know he's the type to avoid any emotional confrontation and is probably scared or something, but it makes me fume.
I'm just glad that Ds never had a chance to get attached to him, so didn't 'lose' someone he already loved...but he asks why he hasn't got a daddy, and cries sometimes.
Amazing thing is that this man now is married to someone with three of her own children, he had two with his still-wife (!) when Ds was born, and left them...why does the new bird trust him??? (Same reason I did, perhaps?)
What makes me really furious is that some men insist on seeing their kids despite it upsetting the mother so much that the kids see her stressed/being sick/ or even go to court to get custody so that the kids are split up, just to prove they are the big man. My other ex did this and was a crap father to his son for 7 years until the poor lad moved back to his mum's and sister's. Makes me sick.
Why do the government not take into account that children need stability and happy mothers/primary carers, not stressed out, scared, angry ones who have to put up with idiots in their lives? It can't be good for kids to be handed over knowing that their Mum doesn't trust or like the person she's leaving them in the care of...I don't think this should be happening. I know kids have the right to see their parents but surely it should always be up to the kids...'they would keep changing their minds and messing everyone about' is probably the argument against child-led access decisions - but don't most of our ex's do the same to our kids?
Ok vent over!!