Ex husband has 'informed' me that he is not obliged to pay maintenance for DD18 from the point at which the Child Benefit stops, in September. She is hoping to go to uni then, grades permitting. Does this sound right, or should this carry on to 19, as my friend has suggested? I realise that at the point she is at uni it makes sense to pay directly to her, but I think he may be trying to scam me for about 3 weeks maintenance. He has form for being tighter than a budgies bum, so is he actually right? Divorce forms just say we have sorted out the financials ourselves. Silly me, I thought that he could behave properly when it came to his only child!