XH is threatening to stop DS's payments to myself, various things are going back & forth, i'm maintaining a reasonable stance, however this has come about as atm I don't have the funds to pay for a divorce currently so his last message was pay up or i will & take it from DS's money (he sees this as not threatening me or DS) I fully intend to get divorced however don't want to be held to ransom for it, or indeed do it & cripple myself as i'm currently on maternity leave until thursday.
anyhow, we're at the stage now where he sees DS when it suits him claiming to be 'working' and is now threatening this - currently it's a private agreement, and i'm not interested in more or less money, just the security that he won't stop it/change it on a whim to suit him, but the thing is on the CSA website it says that I also have to say about DS2 (who isn't XH's,) and consequently my maintenance from XH will be reduced due to getting child benefit for DS2 - is that right? surely not as DS1 is XH's responsibility not DS2, and likewise the other way around.
not looking for flames or an argument but how do things stand?