The only way to offend my "orrid" xp is to take money from him so he's out to do something about it!
I have been receiving maintenance from him through the CSA since Feb 2010, £500 per month towards the upbringing of our dd 4yo. He has her overnight every other weekend for one night, (well actually they stay at his sisters house with her family), he collects her at 10am saturday morning and I collect her from his house on Sunday at 4pm. Periodically he misses his weekends due to working in Europe. When he ponders his payments which he often does, as he loathes the fact that he has to pay the "big fat ugly c**t of a parasite" I often get a text in which he tells me to "fuck off and die, forget it, I'm not having dd this weekend". You get the general idea! :))
Anyway, yesterday was another day of working out how he could pay less.....as he has had the week off work and cannot find anything other than this to occupy him.
So 3 text messages and 4 abusive phone calls later (very brief, him screaming at me, me hanging up), he is "sueing me" for ...well actually I'm not sure what for and he wants dd every other weekend for both the Friday and Saturday night as he understands that that will lower his monthy maintenance payment to us.
I am all for him maintaining regular contact with dd, she loves him and he her. She regularly (virtually every time) says she loves daddy, she wants to go to play but "can you come and get me mummy, I dont want a sleep over at Daddys house". She tells me that she asked him if she could come home and he said no.
. He regularly agrees for me to collect her early on the Sunday though, he has enough of her quite easily or she wants to come home.
Anyway my question is how much would my payments reduce by if he insisted he wanted dd to stay 2 nights every other weekend instead of the current 1.
In the great scheme of things the priority is to maintain the relationship between dd and her Daddy so it's fine and I am happy to support the suggestion but I wish it was due to him genuinely wanting her for longer rather than a way to reduce his payments to us.
Oooops, wasnt really a quick question was it?? !! 