We're thinking of moving out of Central London and after numerous weekends spent driving round the commuter areas, we liked Herts best of anywhere. We've narrowed it down to Harpendon and Tring and really torn between them. We're looking for somewhere for the next 20 years or so, so a big decision.
Our budget is decent, but not in 7 figures. We're looking for 3 bedrooms minimum, small garden and we like quirky older properties or interesting modern. We love Rothschild properties (who doesn't...).
Given we only have one child, it's important that as a teenager she can have a social life and see friends without needing mummy and daddy to drive her everywhere (I grew up miles from anywhere and thank goodness my parents packed me off to boarding school or I'd have gone mad). So, that rules out anywhere really pretty but rural 
Ideally we'd like her to go to an all-girls secondary - private education 'might' be an option, but if there's a great state one then that would be better.
Harpendon - love everything about it except the house prices. We'd like to be in catchment for St Albans Girls School.
Tring - we really, really liked Tring but not sure what it's like in terms of entertainment for teenage girls. Does the Performing Arts school do Saturday classes or is it just for their own students? The girls grammar in Aylesbury would be an option, but is Tring's own secondary really good?
We're more likely to find a house we love and can afford in Tring, but Harpendon seems like a potentially better bet for DD's future - or are we wrong?
We don't need primary schools - DD will commute to London with us. She already has a 35 minute commute in London traffic so not a big change really. So, if there are areas in Harpendon that have nice houses but are good value because they're in catchment for unpopular primaries that would be of interest.
Would be very grateful for any insights. I've read through a lot of the old threads on MN, but many are rather old now.