Good article in the Spectator in response to Gove and (maybe) Cameron sending their kids to state school (well apart from the assumption that it's the father who earns the money
)blogs.spectator.co.uk/fraser-nelson/2014/03/gove-cameron-and-the-myth-of-state-vs-private-schools/.
"I’m lucky enough to have been able to afford a house in a part of London where the state schools are excellent. (And make no mistake: Britain’s best state schools are as good, if not better, than private ones.) I’ve never understood why so many on the left congratulate themselves for sending their kids to a state school, when they have played the system to make damn sure they got into one of the best state schools. And they were able to game the system because had money, connections or both. Is that really so better, or more ‘progressive’, than saving money and going without holidays (as Michael Gove’s parents did) in order send your kids to private schools?"
Very familiar around here. There is already about a £200,000 premium for a house in the catchment of Belleville or Honeywell and that is probably only going to increase as Bolingbroke Academy becomes more established (it had 591 applications for 120 places).
What do people think?