Hi Olive,
Yes I went to see a bunch of schools. Some thoughts, just based on personal opinion!:
St Thomas More: Lovely school, dynamic headteacher. Religion is 10% of curriculum. Students are polite in class, show us doing an animation in one class - brilliant! Grounds are fantastic, looking out into countryside. Generally it seems superb. For us problems are getting in, as we are not catholic - well husband is very lapsed, and last year the intake was completely filled by up to their rule 6 which I think is catholic/religious students. We would come under rule 11! Also most students there go onto a very good catholic school in Stevenage. We are not sure that at age 3 we want to decide our son's Secondary future and the religious aspect of it (he could go elsewhere of course but would lose his friends), so it is not a first choice for us. Worth attending church for if you like it!
Icknield: Was a shock after St Thomas More but in hindsight I think it's fine. The classrooms (especially reception) are more cramped, but that's because they have a 90-kid intake! This is our nearest school and at 400 metres away I think we are at least guaranteed a place here if we don't make it in elsewhere. The head is not as outwardly charismatic as St Thomas More's but it doesn't mean she's not effective. Classes were busy but the kids were doing what they were told or playing nicely (it was a Friday afternoon so they were having some earned 'fun' time). They were forced to take on more kids when Westbury closed. I think they would struggle to get a good Ofsted with so many kids until they have time/money to further expand.
Stonehill: The acting head was nice, but she warned us in advance about the early years unit, which was worrying. It's basically a big shed attached to the school and reception/nursery kids mix together. It was 60 children in chaos! Yes there were lots of adults there too, but I didn't see how they would quietly learn, to be honest. The rest of the school was okay - most kids were being tested while we were there. It's nice to go to a proper primary that sees kids to 11. My husband didn't like the fact that most classrooms were linked together - eg walking through Yr 5 to get to Yr 6 but it didn't bother me so much. Grounds were also nice and look onto countryside. Their main issue is the Early Years Unit. The head promised us this had to change and would change, but whether it could do for 2014, I don't think so. If that classroom changed I would consider it. She is only the acting head too and the proper head position has just been advertised, so there is no guarantee that she will stay in that role.
Northfields: Just very nice really. A lot of kids were out on a day trip but classrooms seemed spacious, children were polite, lots of activity in the hall. I don't have much to say as it was a quick visit. The school secretary showed us around - it was the only place where the head doesn't do the visits. I don't know if this is good or bad. I suppose they don't need to woo people, but does it show that the head doesn't talk to parents generally. I believe the downside to Northfields is The Grange Junior school, which does okay at Ofsted but I have heard slightly concerning things about. Anyway it was all nice, our main problem is that it's a long way from our house. In previous years their catchement has been large but they have done well in Ofsted so I could see them getting more interest.
I am now weighing up going for 'fine' at Icknield, round the corner, 'nice' at Northfields which would be a 40 minute walk away, or 'religious' at St Thomas More which we won't get into anyway. I would like to avoid Stonehill.
I haven't seen Hillshott or Lordship as I understand we wouldn't get in but that both are great. I love the sound of Lordship! But it's too far away. St Nicholas is supposed to be great too but distance+religious=not for us.
Hope that helps a bit :)