I just want to get this all off my chest, I know the answer is really "Wait and find out" but I would like to talk to people about it if that's ok.
The person in question is a 60+ gentleman, I'll just be calling him Bob Fakename for his privacy.
Bob had a medical emergency 2 years ago and is on life long medication for it, but this is something unrelated to anything else mentioned here.
So Bob has been having issues with his lungs. A few months ago a CT scan found nodules on his lungs and he was then sent for a camera down there to see if they were cancerous. After that we were told there was no cancer in the lungs, but the doctors wanted to do a CT scan of the full body to see if there was cancer somewhere else and the nodules were a sign of it spreading to the lungs. That CT scan also came back clear. The lung doctors then sent Bob for a PSA test. This came back at 11, so he was referred to urology.
The urologists was quite baffled by this, they said they'd never had anyone referred to them by respiratory before, but they would take a look. They told us Bob would need a MRI and if that showed anything of significance then he would need a biopsy.
Now he has had a call for a biopsy next week.
Bob also has a fungal infection on his toes. He visited the doctor today who told him that he would need medication to clear it up, but looking at Bob's notes it would be best to wait until the results for the biopsy because "things aren't looking great."
...? We are both full of questions.
Does being sent for a biopsy mean it's pretty likely he has prostate cancer?
Do the nodules on the lungs mean it's likely it's spread to his lungs?
What in earth does the doctor mean about not treating the fungal infection? Is it because it would interact with cancer medication? Or because they're expecting him to pop his clogs before his toes clear up??
I would greatly appreciate any thoughts on this, or even just a pat on the shoulder and a good thought for Bob.