I've also just seen this thread on Twitter, not sure if any use. I've pasted the text below:
There seems to have been this silent bargain struck to say: well, the "original cohort," those kids who are highly gender-nonconforming from the cradle on are fair game for transition.
Because otherwise we'd have to say: it was always wrong, the whole time, every kid. Not a single one was born in the wrong body and if any child felt that way, it was for other reasons that should have been addressed first. And that becomes very uncomfortable.
A lot of the people expressing concern now did not express it then. In fact, they created these children. They shaped the entire lives of these children by their theories and interventions. And it was just wrong the whole time, it was a scandal from the very beginning.
There's also a temptation to put adults on an ice floe and say: of course adults are free to choose blah blah blah. But these interventions don't magically become medicine when a patient turns 18 or 25. The impossible promises transition makes don't suddenly become true.
The patients who seem to me to cope the best with transition are the ones who accept the limits: that these are cosmetic interventions. That they will not change your sex or who you are deep down.
That you will have to live with yourself. That you will not be able to control or even reliably influence how other people see you. That has to be OK.
This is not the way transition is sold to patients these days, whether those patients are children or grownups.
Transition is not medicine. Changing the body to ease the mind does not have a great track record. It is neither treatment nor cure, just alteration. And we can't sell off GNC kids or 'autonomous' adults to shore up a broken paradigm.
Eliza Mondegreen on X: "There seems to have been this silent bargain struck to say: well, the "original cohort," those kids who are highly gender-nonconforming from the cradle on are fair game for transition." / X (twitter.com)