Although I take on board the comments from mumoverseas, it is simply not always the case that CAFCASS do what is right for the child.
What is stated is as it should be, but sadly the reality is often very different.
I speak from very sad experience with a guardian ad litem so bad, even the local authority legal team and social worker describing my treatment as dickensian.
I believe that a number of their officers do abuse their power, because at the end of the day it is easier for a Judge to go with the report of the CAFCASS officer; they are officers of the court and it is not the done thing to impugn their integrity.
To back up what I say, please look at the OFSTED reports for CAFCASS.
However, that is not to say that mumoverseas is wrong, she is right. It is very rare for there to be no contact with the father. It is often suggested by CAFCASS that contact begins in a supervised setting such as a contact centre which may make you feel more secure.
Beware of this; it will not stay there for good, it is a way of re-starting contact where there are doubts about the father and if it goes okay, it will probably lead to unsupervised contact.
We did not stop contact because of any bitterness, it was due to violent, out of control conduct by the father which got to the stage where a panic alarm had to be fitted in my home by the police. He has convictions for violence.
Sorry to be negative. I strongly recommend you get a solicitor who wants to fight (perhaps the wrong word) for your child and yourself. It is also important to get a good barrister, go with your instincts. Dont be afraid to change.