About 5 years ago I was called for jury duty and ended up on the jury.
Something that has bugged me ever since was that there were so many unanswered questions.
I was desperate to ask several questions, which obviously neither the prosecution nor defence were. I felt unable to sentence someone with such flimsy evidence.
The crime was found not proven (Scottish law) whereas I voted not guilty on the grounds that nothing had been proven to me.
Is it not possible for the jury to direct a question to a person in the stand? How can you judge when your questions have not been answered?