Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Legal matters

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

Likelihood of a GBH prosecution?

48 replies

liquoriceandblack92 · 26/05/2026 21:45

My 16 year old daughter was staying with her dad, whilst me and her stepdad were away for the weekend.
She has been hanging out in the park, drinking with a group of teenagers. A 15 year old boy stole one of her belongings, she has retaliated and pulled his hair. He told her to let go twice, and she didn't so he punched her in the face. Her jaw is broken in two places, plus another fracture. She has had surgery to put plates in her jaw, and dental surgery. She is on a liquid diet for 6 weeks. This is going to impact her GCSEs. There are several witness accounts and cctv. What is the likelihood of CPS decididng to prosecute this boy for GBH? He has been involved in fights before, but as far as we are aware he has never been prosecuted. I'm trying to prepare her for every possibility.

OP posts:
Devonshiregal · 26/05/2026 23:22

you really shouldn't be worrying about that right now. you should be worrying that your daughter was in a situation where her jaw was broken and that she launched at him instead of just leaving/crying/shouting/calling you or her dad. If she had been at a slightly different angle when he hit her, imagine the damage he might have caused. He could have killed her. She's probably lucky it was her jaw. The police are pushing for charges because they've had run ins with him in the past and want something they can actually use and are hoping this is it - it isn't in some kind of support for your daughter and the damage to her face. She needs therapy and to not be in that situation again not to be be made the centre of some kind of weird courtroom drama.
(ETA... in my opinion)

liquoriceandblack92 · 26/05/2026 23:48

Devonshiregal · 26/05/2026 23:22

you really shouldn't be worrying about that right now. you should be worrying that your daughter was in a situation where her jaw was broken and that she launched at him instead of just leaving/crying/shouting/calling you or her dad. If she had been at a slightly different angle when he hit her, imagine the damage he might have caused. He could have killed her. She's probably lucky it was her jaw. The police are pushing for charges because they've had run ins with him in the past and want something they can actually use and are hoping this is it - it isn't in some kind of support for your daughter and the damage to her face. She needs therapy and to not be in that situation again not to be be made the centre of some kind of weird courtroom drama.
(ETA... in my opinion)

Edited

I can be worried about multiple things at once.
I am asking for advice about what these young people can expect, not a lecture.
I was not present, nor responsible for caring for her at the time, as she was staying with her Dad at the weekend, so a lecture about the situation is of no benefit to me. She has never been in a situation like this whilst in my care. I am however, as the resident parent, the one who is picking up the pieces, dealing with her physical and mental recovery, and now taking over all of the practical stuff such as police, CPS, school and safeguarding. Which is why I am asking for advice about the legal possibilities going forward.

OP posts:
Aluna · 26/05/2026 23:57

Wolfiefan · 26/05/2026 23:04

In the U.K. it’s not up to a victim whether to prosecute. It’s up to the CPS.
Maybe focus on getting your daughter recovered. Not letting her drinking in parks and hair pulling in future.

What she means is the police are encouraging her to support their investigation, ie to make a formal statement and potentially commit to being a prosecution witness.

Devonshiregal · 27/05/2026 00:08

liquoriceandblack92 · 26/05/2026 23:48

I can be worried about multiple things at once.
I am asking for advice about what these young people can expect, not a lecture.
I was not present, nor responsible for caring for her at the time, as she was staying with her Dad at the weekend, so a lecture about the situation is of no benefit to me. She has never been in a situation like this whilst in my care. I am however, as the resident parent, the one who is picking up the pieces, dealing with her physical and mental recovery, and now taking over all of the practical stuff such as police, CPS, school and safeguarding. Which is why I am asking for advice about the legal possibilities going forward.

I didnt realise we had to be so prescribed with our answers. And from the legal side of things I was trying to point out that the police do not care about her, there just using her to further their own agenda. which is a big thing to take into account when thinking this through.

FictionalCharacter · 27/05/2026 00:11

Devonshiregal · 27/05/2026 00:08

I didnt realise we had to be so prescribed with our answers. And from the legal side of things I was trying to point out that the police do not care about her, there just using her to further their own agenda. which is a big thing to take into account when thinking this through.

Why do you believe you know what the police are thinking?

FictionalCharacter · 27/05/2026 00:15

TheseWordsAreMine · 26/05/2026 22:16

It will all hang on the CCTV and the witnesses.

If he gave her two chances then it's an act of self defence. He's not responsible for her low calcium bone density and she was both older and the original aggressor.

If he hit her once, self defence, multiple times, different story.

Impossible to say one way or the other. They will look at another other history of police involvement before and family backgrounds.

Low bone density? OP didn't say anything about that. You know that people with good bone density get fractures?

AGlessandahalf · 27/05/2026 00:24

liquoriceandblack92 · 26/05/2026 23:00

This is what the police have told us. If this is wrong then I will question that with them

Recording crime and CPS charging standards are two completely separate things.
ask them to explain that to you

AGlessandahalf · 27/05/2026 00:29

Are you in England and Wales?
Has your daughter already provided a video recorded interview?

Tbh as the criminal barrister has already given advice I can’t add much more, other than I would not put my daughter through a prosecution when it was 50/50.
She has to take some responsibility for consequences based on the circumstances you have provided.

TheseWordsAreMine · 27/05/2026 01:29

FictionalCharacter · 27/05/2026 00:15

Low bone density? OP didn't say anything about that. You know that people with good bone density get fractures?

If we can take this post as being real. Look at the damage from one punch.

thetinsoldier · 27/05/2026 01:43

Ffs. he started all this by stealing her things. So he is then responsible for the shit show that followed. I’d also say that he had options: he could have shoved her away or something less violent then punching a girl in the face.

cleansun · 27/05/2026 02:11

TheseWordsAreMine · 27/05/2026 01:29

If we can take this post as being real. Look at the damage from one punch.

That was the point of the one punch campaign… it can do a lot of damage. physically I imagine the boy is bigger and stronger and did it with some force
i was punched once in the eye, it fractured my cheekbone and eye socket and the pain was unbelievable. I don’t have low bone density

DryadsRest · 27/05/2026 02:29

The police should have a good idea of chance if successful prosecution,
did she ask him to give her things back before she held his hair? And if he took items she was wearing like shoes surely thats another aggravating factor. He may also have insulted her when or before or during taking her things also

whattheysay · 27/05/2026 08:48

TheseWordsAreMine · 26/05/2026 23:02

With one punch had had no idea how much damage would be caused, if it was more than one punch it would be.

People have died from one punch so how does that work then?
The puncher has been prosecuted for it, the defence of I didn’t know how much damage would be done hasn’t stopped the prosecution. Maybe as a mitigating factor but not as a defence.
I don’t think who started it counts either, your defence can’t be I killed him but I didn’t mean to and he started it therefore I am not guilty.

Obviously the punch didn’t kill her but isn’t the principal the same?

One punch may not be unreasonable but the result of that punch has to have some kind of consequences.

This is purely as a legal question, I do agree with other posters this isn’t necessarily the type of male to female violence the op is trying to warn her daughter about.

JohnofWessex · 27/05/2026 11:29

Its a pity we dont have anything like the Scottish Childrens Panels who could have dished out some intervention in this young thugs life much sooner.

FictionalCharacter · 27/05/2026 11:59

TheseWordsAreMine · 27/05/2026 01:29

If we can take this post as being real. Look at the damage from one punch.

It’s common to get fractures from one punch and it doesn’t indicate low bone density. The damage depends on the force of the punch and where it landed.
People have been killed by a single punch.

Devonshiregal · 27/05/2026 12:18

FictionalCharacter · 27/05/2026 00:11

Why do you believe you know what the police are thinking?

I believe I know what they’re thinking because I have enough experience with them too have seen this kind of thing before. I also don’t believe the police as a system are designed to “care” about individuals. I also noted op had said something about how the kid has had lots of run ins with the police but not yet seen any significant outcome from this. This is a perfect opportunity to try to crack down on someone who clearly needs it. There are people up and down this country who have been lulled into a false sense of having the police on their side/their back up, only to later find the support just drops away the moment they aren’t of use as a pawn anymore. And that is a hurtful situation to find yourself in, especially as a teenager who has suffered a broken jaw.

TheseWordsAreMine · 27/05/2026 13:00

Not much point replying to the other people who have quoted me.

My original post stands. We don't know, it will be in the CCTV and the witness statements.

PenelopePinkerton · 27/05/2026 14:51

liquoriceandblack92 · 26/05/2026 22:52

The force used to break someone's jaw in two places and cause a seperate fracture is disproportionate to the force used to pull someone's hair . Hair pulling is minor assault. A broken jaw is GBH. The police believe from witness statements, medical records and cctv that he has used excessive force and he told them himself he was angry at her, he has said this is why he didn't first attempt to shove her off. They are encouraging my daughter to prosecute. She has not been arrested. I only came here to ask the likelihood of CPS deciding to prosecute if she does proceed with it. She isn't sure what she would like to do

The police are giving wrong info here as your daughter has no ability to prosecute. In the UK it is the CPS who decide. The victim does not.

femfemlicious · 27/05/2026 16:01

Aluna · 26/05/2026 22:59

What is this nonsense? She wasn’t the instigator - he was - by stealing a possession of hers - she pulled his hair to make him give it back, which he did not. Punching a girl in the jaw and breaking it in no way meets the “reasonable” or “proportionate” requirement of self defence.

What do the police say OP?

My thoughts exactly!. She was simply trying to get him to return her items! . I'm sure that's why the police are on her side.

Aluna · 27/05/2026 16:44

AGlessandahalf · 27/05/2026 00:29

Are you in England and Wales?
Has your daughter already provided a video recorded interview?

Tbh as the criminal barrister has already given advice I can’t add much more, other than I would not put my daughter through a prosecution when it was 50/50.
She has to take some responsibility for consequences based on the circumstances you have provided.

The victim blaming really needs to stop.

This is not a 50:50 situation.

He stole a personal item and when she pulled his hair to get the item back he punched her face and caused a fracture. Essentially he’s committed 2 crimes - 1 theft and 1 ABH (or whatever the correct charge) whereas she - pulled his hair - not a crime anywhere.

Luckily the police are more realistic/objective.

BillieWiper · 27/05/2026 21:03

I'm not sure about GBH as but it's definitely some form of bad assault if it broke her jaw. So definitely tell the police then you do have to leave it in their hands.

This sounds like such an unruly and dangerous environment I'd be worried for all the kids there.

AGlessandahalf · 28/05/2026 20:11

Aluna · 27/05/2026 16:44

The victim blaming really needs to stop.

This is not a 50:50 situation.

He stole a personal item and when she pulled his hair to get the item back he punched her face and caused a fracture. Essentially he’s committed 2 crimes - 1 theft and 1 ABH (or whatever the correct charge) whereas she - pulled his hair - not a crime anywhere.

Luckily the police are more realistic/objective.

Unfortunately your information is not correct.
hair pulling is also classified as an assault, albeit a common assault depending on if any reddening of his skin after.

I am going by the letter of the law in terms of offences.

CPS charging standards are very different to what is recorded and I would suggest a broken jaw with one punch would be considered a S47 assault.

I’m not victim blaming when I say I wouldn’t want my daughter going to court where she had also committed an offence, even in self defence. That’s a personal opinion that I have of youth courts and the justice system.

Aluna · 28/05/2026 20:35

AGlessandahalf · 28/05/2026 20:11

Unfortunately your information is not correct.
hair pulling is also classified as an assault, albeit a common assault depending on if any reddening of his skin after.

I am going by the letter of the law in terms of offences.

CPS charging standards are very different to what is recorded and I would suggest a broken jaw with one punch would be considered a S47 assault.

I’m not victim blaming when I say I wouldn’t want my daughter going to court where she had also committed an offence, even in self defence. That’s a personal opinion that I have of youth courts and the justice system.

Interesting. However you have the right to use reasonable force to protect your property and prevent a crime.

She hasn’t committed an offence as the police not charged her and don’t appear to be planning to.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread