Outline - I am joint owner of a property held as joint tenants with a family member who has gone into care. The family member opposed the sale through legal representation by a court appointed controller who was initially acting as her solicitor. Lengthy proceedings ensued with the judgement issued that delayed the sale until the family member/joint owner went into care. This happened only a few months after the judgement was given.
However the property has only now been ordered to proceed to sale, after 2 years of the house having been left vacant and unsold due to the patient being moved around several care homes but never returning to live at the property. The solicitors firm ran up a hefty bill paid for the previous court proceedings by Legal Aid. The controller/solicitor has subsequently left his previous legal firm and started up a new one. He has proposed his own new firm do the conveyancing. He appears to be instructing an assistant to deal directly with communications and handle the sale. The assistant is a qualified solicitor but not certified to practice conveyancing. I understand that conveyancing solitors can instruct trainees or personal assistants to carry out a lot of the administrative work.
The question is, does the fact that the Controller is also acting as the covert conveyancer instructing his assistant behind the scenes represent a conflict of interests? I understand it to be the case that a controller cannot do the conveyancing but does this apply where the controller is also a solicitor? Even if another solicitor from his new firm were acting as the conveyancing solicitor, would the bias not infringe on neutrality and represent conflict of interests?
I would be interested on anyone's experience or take on this.