Re: Collusion - I put this in wrong group earlier so RPing here

[greekislandsparty]

Hello all this is going to seem far fetched to many of you but humour me and assume I’m right
Im going through private family law proceedings.
My ex is Nigerian and the shift in proceedings to his favour indicate that everyone included in the process atp is colluding against me bc he’s bribed them. The last hearing, my Barrister, also a part time family court judge (Recorder) was so shocked at the behaviour of both the judge and my then solicitor that she wrote in her after hearing briefing that she was close to asking the judge to recuse himself due to certain comments and decisions he made. He backtracked when she challenged him which is why she didn’t.
She told me in no uncertain terms to change solicitors. I already had suspicions and a little proof that my solicitor was colluding with the other side (bribed). There’s nothing concrete I can use.

Relying on the professionals involved to all of a sudden develop some sort of integrity and do the right thing is a fail. Even so, my ex has them by the b@lls now if they’ve accepted a bribe and the person I know will ruin their lives and careers with it. Therefore they no all have a vested interest in protecting each other.
One of the issues is abduction to a non hague country.

What I need to do is prove unequivocally that the professionals involved are bias and colluding. How do I do this practically and legally (if consider hypothetically non legal as a discussion).

The agencies involved
Judge
Police
3 lawyers (his lawyer, my ex lawyer, a court lawyer)
family court adviser

To many of you this will seem far fetched and conspiracy theory like, pls don’t waste your energy on this post. I’m dealing with a covert abuser who gained access to over 400k last year due to the sale of a house we didn’t even know he owned. I know what I e experienced and am experiencing. I’m just pleading that if anyone has any HELPFUL ideas that eill
help me please share them.
Women’s aid and reunite are aware. I’m not looking for anymore referrals to agencies.
Thank you in advance

Its not your job to prove anything - I dare say it would be impossible for you to do so on account of having no investigatory powers

Report the solicitor to the SRA and the Judge to the JCIO, and the police to the IOCP - it is their role to investigate

If only it was that straight forward. I’d have to show you how I’ve already been blackballed and told not to ‘antagonise’ the judge by not letting this go. People know people who know people and can sweep complaints under the rug. It’s happened

OP, having skimmed your posting history, I’m going to suggest that you visit your GP, and focus your energies and money on getting some good therapy, as this idea that your ex has bribed numerous police, court and legal professionals seems to be just one in a long line of scenarios where you’ve become convinced multiple unconnected people are colluding against you, gaslighting you, or trying to victimise you.

If you don’t believe your solicitor has provided you with a good service you can raise a complaint with their firm and it will be handled through their complaints procedure, which will be set out on their website and in the engagement documentation from when you engaged them.

I’m not a premium member to be able to see your posting history and wonder if that’s what u do all day on here? I’d hazard a guess that you’re this condescending to everyone and so arrogant with your POV that the idea that someone else’s reality could even be true makes you question their MH. You would have been better off scrolling along.

You know what you can do with your Ill informed, dangerous and arrogant POV? Yes that! DO IT!!!

You don't need a premium membership to see someone's posting history. You simply go to Advanced Search and ask for posts by their username.

I understand @ComtesseDeSpair's scepticism. Whilst it is not impossible, it is highly unlikely that your ex could bribe a judge, three lawyers, the police and a family court adviser. You are accusing multiple people of criminal offences. It appears you very little in the way of evidence beyond proceedings not going the way you want. Your barrister's comments don't necessarily mean that anyone is accepting bribes.

@Rosecoffeecup has already told you where you should take your allegations. If you are unwilling to accept that advice, there is nothing anyone on here can do to help.

I’m going to agree with others… this idea that there are coverups and collusion in multiple areas of your life seems to be a common theme for you. And it’s highly unlikely that you’re somehow victim to so many unrelated people being able to conspire against you in multiple areas of your life. I’d genuinely seek some medical help over the thoughts you’re having.

Another one that needs to keep scrolling bc even your comment is inaccurate about MY page. No I can’t see the history bc it tells ME I need a premium account.

It’s annoying having told people who do not believe this level of collusion happens to simply scroll that u are all here 😂😂go away and save ur energy for a post that will appreciate this energy. I don’t. I’m of sound mind and have always been. Silly people

Are you clicking "see all" on a posters name in this thread? That shows you all their posts on this thread and yes you do need a Premium subscription to do it.

But anyone can search a user name with the Advanced Search function, to find all their past posts. That doesn't need a Premium subscription.

I would contact the governing bodies in @Rosecoffeecup post. Other than making formal complaints I'm not sure what other action you could personally take.

https://www.mumsnet.com/search/advanced#/?username=greekislandsparty&type=all&topics=&page=1&sort=_search Posting history here, HTH

My comment about how you find a poster's history is 100% correct. At the head of this page is a link to Advanced Search. Click on that then put the name of any poster in the "Search for posts by a specific username" box and click on Search and you will see all that person's posts (or the most recent 2,500 of them if they are a regular poster). That does not need a premium account.

I did not say you were wrong, although as I say you are accusing multiple people of criminal offences with very little actual evidence. However, to say again, the only way forward is to follow @Rosecoffeecup's advice. If you are not willing to do that, no-one can help you.

Attacking people who are trying to be helpful is not going to get you the support you want.

I wish you luck OP, but if you’ve no evidence for any of your accusations and refuse to report to professional bodies and ombudsmans as Rosecoffeecup advised because you believe anyone who receives the reports will also collude against, you’ve really reached the end of the road.

I’d also counsel you to think very carefully about your situation and how you present it when approaching new solicitors; as any narrative which includes “I sacked my former solicitor off because they were colluding with my ex’s solicitor, the courts, the judge, and the police who were all accepting bribes” is going to be the fastest route to finding yourself with no representation at all.

That will be done at the right time and it’s an obvious solution to what seems an impossible situation. Given the nature of it all, I’ve been advised not to do any of that at present. Therefore, my question was about thinking outside of the box. For example, a financial services investigator was a suggestion recently. That is the outside of the box thinking I was asking for and had not considered myself.

Im not offended that people won’t believe this. I expect that. I will take offence at their inference that they don’t believe me bc I have a MH issue and will defend that.

My hope is that anyone who’s gone against the ‘system’ feels some sort of solidarity.

We wouldn’t have people like Rump being there leader of the free world (USA) if people had not colluded to protect him from the multiple federal allegations against him. It’s an extreme high profile example but that people think it doesn’t happen is naive at best and to automatically blame someone’s MH is the cheapest and oldest trick in the book.

It can feel like that sometimes. I’m very lucky to have fantastic representation currently and I didn’t find them myself. They are also a legal 500 company and I only say that to say, they’ve taken in my case for a reason. They are doing what they need to do. I am thinking outside of the box. I may come up with nothing, but it’s worth a try.

I take your point about how it ‘sounds’ though. I would think the same if I were the average person who was not in a situation like this.

Thank you for sharing this method, I’m not on here enough to have known it and a search of my history will show you that my posts have been mainly in relation to family law proceedings and childhood queries.

Please note I’m not attacking anyone. I will however respond to any speculation/allegations/inferences about the state of my mental health, that’s my right. Not only are they WRONG they are annoying annd irrelevant and the typical response to q scenarios like this. It is exactly why I asked those who are skeptical to scroll on. That saves us all time.

Thank you for shrimp this method and acknowledging the method I used too.

Quite an apt example that two things can be true and bc I know one way doesn’t mean there can’t be another way.

I don’t have a premium subscription and I’m able to “see all” on a thread by one poster? 🤔

It always used to be the case that anyone could "see all" on the OP's posts but only Premium members could do it with other posters on a thread. Maybe it's changed though!