@prh47bridge @collaborate
Have followed your responses in previous threads
What would you suggest in this instance?
- court hearing (arranged by CMS) pulled because they couldn't confirm 'living' address
- 'living address' was established during financial investigation (by CMS after variation request) a few months back
- CMS says can't do anything until 'living' address established (despite directorships,land registry addresses etc)
Surely courts are familiar with people in permanent hiding and can put a charge on assets in the absence of confirmed address? Have there been any relevant cases? What's the procedure like? Any pointers appreciated