Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Legal matters

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

Medical negligence claim 3 years after incident?

105 replies

Dayman2024 · 20/08/2024 14:50

Hoping for some advice on whether my claim would even be accepted, as the incident itself happened over 3 years ago.

Without going into too much detail, I gave birth to my first daughter in June 2021. My labour was incredibly quick and as she was crowning they said they needed to do an episiotomy and ventouse delivery. I said no. More than once. My husband also told them no. They did it anyway. 2 weeks into the recovery I noticed it was still quite painful, so I got it checked out and I was told that the wound had opened but that it didn’t need to be re-sutured. Since then, I’ve experienced pain during sex and I’ve only had sex with my husband a handful of times, so my relationship has taken a toll.

I became pregnant with my second daughter in August 2023 and because of my previous birth trauma, I opted for an elective c-section. I had to have a birth choices appointment in March 2024 to discuss my reasoning, and after I explained everything that had happened to me to the consultant, she advised me that I was essentially assaulted by the doctor who performed the episiotomy as I had not given consent, and that I should write a complaint to the hospital and to the GMC. She also said it’s very likely I now also have PTSD as a result of the birth trauma.

Then just last week, I had a gynaecology appointment as my GP had referred me in August 2023 due to the ongoing pain during sex. She examined me, and confirmed that I have a disfigurement due to the episiotomy and that I will need reconstructive surgery. I asked her, if the wound had been re-sutured when it opened, would the disfigurement have happened, and she said most likely not.

So, after all this, I’m now looking at instructing a lawyer to make a medical negligence claim on my behalf. But I’m not sure about the 3 year limitation period. I’ve done some research and I think, it would apply from the birth choices appointment I had in March 2024? Or the gynae appointment as I was officially diagnosed? I would appreciate any advice and I’m happy to answer questions too. Thank you

OP posts:
DoreenonTill8 · 20/08/2024 22:05

Staunchlystarling · 20/08/2024 21:55

I’m shocked as well, if what the poster is writing is accurate and I’m not sure it is, I cannot beleive a woman can effectively have her baby die through choice and the medical team say right then bye crack on. And everyone just walks away after and gets on with their life.

Well as long as mum's happy, seems to be according to some that's all that matters.

Destiny123 · 20/08/2024 22:13

ComtesseDeSpair · 20/08/2024 18:09

Medicine sometimes is horrifying. People will refuse transplants, chemotherapy, surgery, antibiotics and staff have to watch them suffer. But as long as an individual has the capacity to make the decision, it’s theirs to make.

The reality is that I doubt there’s been a single case where a pregnant woman, having actually had it explained to her that refusing treatment would be lethal for her baby, wouldn’t change her mind and consent: so few medics have to really dwell on what the consequences would actually be.

Edited

Psychosis would be the main one I can think of. We had a 6h wait while the courts debated our permission to do a csection. We asked what happened in the interim if the ctg went off but the advice given by our lawyers was totally incorrect do we were lucky that it didnt

ForGreyKoala · 20/08/2024 22:16

DefyingGravitas · 20/08/2024 18:38

That doesn’t remove the right to consent. Obviously. It’s this type of attitude that allows (some, these) doctors to treat women as pieces of meat.

So OP would have been absolutely fine if the doctors had gone with her and her husband's wishes and the baby died? Living life without a care in the world. I don't think so. How is doing something to obtain a live, healthy, baby's arrival treating a woman as a piece of meat. I very much doubt OP and her husband know more than a doctor when it comes to this issue.

Destiny123 · 20/08/2024 22:16

DoreenonTill8 · 20/08/2024 18:05

I'm finding this all quite horrifying.If a woman refused the procedure it would then be explained to her very clearly what refusing would mean for her and her baby: that they would both very likely die. It would be very unusual then for a woman to continue to refuse - but if she did, there wouldn’t be a medical negligence case to answer to. The woman had capacity and had it clearly explained to her what the consequences would be.
Would the staff all have to back off? Stop trying to save the baby, watch it in distress on the monitor and then die?

Yes. Not much different to watching mum die from haemorrhage as a JW

ComtesseDeSpair · 21/08/2024 11:31

DoreenonTill8 · 20/08/2024 22:05

Well as long as mum's happy, seems to be according to some that's all that matters.

Obstetrics as a field of medicine is often a fine balance between the care of an unborn baby and the rights and needs of a pregnant woman. A pregnant woman with capacity has a perfect right to damage her unborn baby if she wants to: nobody can force her to accept antenatal care or attend scans; if a scan identifies an anomaly which could be easily corrected in utero, she still has the right to refuse that corrective treatment, even if doing so would harm the foetuses chance of survival; she can smoke, drink and take all kinds of drugs whilst pregnant if she chooses to. It might be unpalatable, but it’s far preferable to the alternative, which is a woman’s bodily autonomy and right to consent to what happens to her body being sidelined in favour of the unborn. We’ve been there and tried that – the results aren’t pretty.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread