I recently found out that one of the tenants in a 3 room HMO was not staying there, but had allowed another man to use the room.
I visited the property and spoke to the man and told him he should not be there.
The Tenancy Agreement has clauses regarding visitors and states specifically that they should be supervised by the tenant and not given a key.
He told me that he was there whilst the tenant stayed with his partner, who had recently given birth.
He said he did not pay any rent to the tenant.
I advised the tenant that he should not have anyone in the flat when he was not there to supervise them and asked him if he still wanted the tenancy to continue. He said he did, and for the first time mentioned that the man was his brother.
The tenant has now said that he wants to terminate the tenancy. He didn’t quite give the required one months notice to end on the last day of his rent month, but I accepted this on condition that vacant possession was given, all keys returned, etc.
He had been due to pay his rent 2 days before he gave notice. He hasn’t made that payment, and has only replied by text that he wants to give up the room.
His rent is now 2 weeks overdue, according to the other tenants he has not lived there for over 2 months, and all of his possessions were removed around that time.
I currently have his deposit, which is slightly less than his month’s rent, but would be willing to end the tenancy straight away and refund the balance.
As the person staying in his room is not a sub tenant ( Tenancy Agreement forbids subletting but know that if he was a sub tenant I would have to go to court) can I legally just ask him to leave?
I don’t want to do anything which is not correct but similarly I don’t want an unknown person, whose references and right to reside have not been checked, living in the property.