I've been posting on the Property section in recent days about a structural issue in the house I moved into three weeks ago. We were told by a builder this week that when the kitchen was extended, a supporting wall was knocked down and no supporting beam installed overhead. This work was done over 15 years ago. When we viewed the house we didn't realise the kitchen was extended as we had never been in a house of that style before and the vendor never mentioned it either. We called the builder in when we noticed the floor above was sagging slightly after pulling up a carpet.
We looked back at the survey done by the vendor (homebuyers, we didn't go for a full survey as there was nothing concerning on the homebuyers one) and there is no mention anywhere of the kitchen having been extended or of a supporting wall having been removed. My solicitor advised that if this had been mentioned, she would have looked into it further but as it wasn't, she could only go on the information she was presented with when looking into previous work carried out.
So now we are going to be out of pocket to have this rectified. If we had known about this, we wouldnt have bought the house as it would have been too stressful and disruptive to sort. We have two school age children and I'm a final year student, supposed to be going on final placement and completing a dissertation this month, both of which are likely going to be delayed due to all of this stress. Is it worth pursuing some kind of claim here? I've heard it's very difficult to get a surveyor to admit fault. We are in Scotland, if that makes a difference.