Dear all,
I wrote this thread yesterday but it got removed for breaking forum rules - I cannot found how it broke them (I went through them) but in any case I will rewrite in another way.
I have had an extremely bad experience with NYAS. The guardian I had was extremely racist and Islamophobic. The things she wrote were horrifically racist. She told many lies and these were all exposed in court. However, this is not the point really. The point is, she did it and she gets away with it. The only people this really hurts are the children. The fact that her own prejudices can come before children's welfare cannot be understated.
The lies were such an extent that I paid an ISW to observe the children and I together. The guardian has never seen my children and I together. The guardian then spoke to the ISW about this observation and wrote a report, not realising at the time it seems, that the ISW was also commissioned to write a report. The two reports were starkly different - the guardian's presented me extremely negatively - the ISW's was extremely positive. It seemed the guardian was so desperate to paint me in a bad light that she twisted the ISW's words to try and make them sound as negative as possible. Obviously, this is colloquially known as 'shooting oneself in the foot' or 'exposing your biased a**' and 'egg on your face' - and proved her prejudice and agenda clearly. It was quite glorious. Though, as mentioned, what can be done about such open-ended and blatant lying? Should the ISW have not written a report, only the guardian's would have been presented to the court. This would have been extremely prejudicial. In both cases - she has gotten away with it anyway.
One thing which was extremely distressing was that even though she me extremely unwell and hospitalised, she kept implying I was lying about my health. This - even though I presented medical letters proving my health status. It is of note, that my health isn't something that people can minimise in these situations - e.g. mental health and anxiety (which are serious but such people deride), but serious, vital organ condition which cannot be argued against. It is extremely strange she tried to. It was akin to having no eyes but her arguing that I was lying about not being able to see. That's how bizarre it is.
The most alarming thing is, that while this guardian's report was like it was, NYAS contiuned to push forward with it. To me, this was contrary to its purpose - when the lies had been clearly exposed, how can a NYAS solicitor - an officer of the court - continue with it? But they did, knowing it was fabricated and full of falsehoods. It is one thing not knowing - but they knew as I had shown them even prior to court. To me this is clear contempt of court.
As such, I would like to take legal action against NYAS. I understand they are a charity and there are a few options, depending if they obtained a public certificate of funding or not:
- Discrimination under Equality Act
- Human Rights claims (art 6, 8, etc)
- Judicial Review
- Potential criminal - though I do not know how
- Breach of any statutory duty of care?
If anyone else has had any similar problems with NYAS, please do let me know. It would be good if we could get a few people together and see what we could do. I am happy to take legal action and a class action would be best.
At the end of the day, these (in my opinion) lazy charlatans hurt children and they need to be held to account.
Thank you for reading