Flat is share of freehold. Just hypothetical at the moment as dog in question is still a couple of years away. When we bought the flat 2 years ago I remember reading in the leasehold terms that leaseholders need a 'dog licence'. I didn't think anything of it as I knew the dog was in the future.
When we moved into the flat we were given a 'resident rule book'. This said that no more 'dog licences' are allowed.
To me this seems dishonest and something should've been said upfront when you purchase the property. Will there be any legal grounds to challenge this? Should the lease not be changed so that purchasers are made aware?
Where would we stand?