I'm hoping for some advice please 🙏
I had an accident last year which wasn't my fault and resulted in a nasty wrist injury requiring surgery.
The other side admitted liability to my solicitors and also pleaded guilty in criminal court (it was a business at fault as they breached multiple h&s laws).
One of the independent experts I've had to see as part of my compensation claim wrote in his report that I've permanently lost 50% of the mobility of my wrist as well as some of the hand function. It's my dominant hand. He also wrote "on the balance of probability there's a 50% chance she will develop osteoarthritis in her wrist within the next 10 years as it was an intro-articular fracture".
My solicitor asked him if he thought I'd be able to continue with my current job to which his additional report basically said "impossible to say".
The accident was 18m ago.
Today as part of my claim my solicitor has added in the part about arthritis and put in a total amount of £275 which is essentially for a course of physio should it develop.
Does this sound correct? I don't want to query it If it doesn't, however he has made a few errors already which I've been confident in addressing (and I've been correct) and as I felt like this was quite a big point I don't want to end up developing arthritis in say 5 years and being in a position where I learn we should have put in for more.
Obviously that's just a part of the claim - not taking into account the other financial elements for the wrist, head , shoulder injuries, psychological damage and so on which we have not yet discussed.
If anyone has advice I'd be very grateful.