My husband has been going through courts now for three years to see his elder children.
We had early help involvement last year regarding some family issues (nothing bad, I just wanted support at the time and we are now discharged) .
Naturally a few months back cafcass wanted a report about my husband. All done, dusted. Was a nice report.
Months later, they are now requesting to know their opinion on my sons potential sen, and my daughters health issues. (Both under 5, health issue is nothing that would raise potential red flags) . Also if I have suffered from depression and if I am being treated for it.
I am perplexed as to a) how they got this information to begin with b) annoyed, as due to the ages of his eldest, and the potential parental alienation at play. Since this case started his elder two have changed their stance on him, and us as a family to what it originally was in the first documents. To wanting zero contact. Due to this and now their ages being at an age court will listen, cafcass are advising indirect regardless with just my husband.
So why? I don't feel comfortable with my children's medical history somehow being shared without my knowledge. As I assume either larent would have had to sign that off? Nor how its relevant to this case.
And more importantly, his ex is high conflict and has been known to not keep things confidential and gloat on fb or similar.
I don't post anything about my children online, personal or photos. And I do not trust her to see this information as anything other than a stick to beat my family with. Which is a common theme in all areas.
Is this ethical? Is this justified?