Brief issue
Purchased an "Approved Used" car from a main dealer
The dealer mis-sold service history and warranty
Promised FSH but car has partial history with 6 years history missing.
Warranty is invalid as the condition for warranty needs car to have service done annually.
After threatening with legal action, they are offering a full refund. No apology or admission of mistake. Rather praising their ethos.
However I did not ask for a full refund. My offer was to refund some amount to reflect the true value as the car is not worth what I paid for - due to partial history and no warranty. In my proposals I have asked 20% of the price I paid as refund.
I do not ideally prefer to return the car as I like it and it does not have any issue and it will be hassle and additional expenses (parking permit, insurance etc) to get another car. Plus the time I will be without a car.
Is there any ground for me to take this to small claims court for a partial refund OR
will the court go against me suggesting that as the dealer offered full refund, I should have taken it?
I am still within the 30 day period and I made some payment with the credit card.
If the broad consensus is that I should take the offer for full refund, what other actions can I take so that car dealers do not get away with such outright lies which cause unnecessary trouble to customers.
Thanks