I accidentally reversed my car into the neighbours wall, it’s about a 25 ft long, low wall and about 4 bricks are missing from the top where I bumped
it but about 3.5 ft of the wall is structurally weak and needs replacing.
We are looking to sort this without going through the insurance. My partner put me
onto his trade insurance 3 weeks ago and is refusing to claim through it this early, if I had my own policy I’d claim on it. However this is my problem:
1). The neighbour is saying he wants the entire wall rebuilt and has quoted 2K!! because whatever repair we do will ‘not match’ as the new bricks will not be weathered like the rest of the wall, and where the cement is around each brick
it will look different. I’ve asked builders myself about matching the cement colour and whilst they can, it’ll be difficult.
2). My partner says that it doesn’t matter and the neighbour gets to decide how the wall is mended as it’s his wall.
3). If only A row of 5 bricks were damaged,
would we be legally obliged to replace the entire wall? How far can you go with the ‘not matching argument’. If my house burnt down in part and the bricks wouldn’t match due to discontinuation of the brick or due to weathering, the insurers wouldn’t knocks down the entire house would they?
4). I have no problem repairing the damage I have done, but feel completely taken advantage of with this and am so disappointed
in my partner who is outside telling our neighbour ‘oh we know it looks a mess im
so Sorry we will fix it to your liking’. 2 grand??? Really?
- The wall is hideous and 20 years
old. It looks an absolute state before I bumped it. We’re not talking about a piece of art here.
Am I legally entitled to repair the wall
so it matches?