Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Legal matters

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

Difference between Executive And Pre-Litigation Executive

12 replies

Vickimf · 24/04/2020 16:28

Hi

Could someone explain the difference between these job titles please.

My case was with an Executive but has now been passed onto a Pre-Litigation Executive because of an absence.

Currently I have not been happy with the Executive because they have ignored emails and not kept me upto date.

Thanks

OP posts:
redastherose · 25/04/2020 17:42

Neither job titles state whether either of them are legally qualified. I'd guess at unqualified legal assistants. Most qualified people will be referred to by their qualification ie Barrister, Solicitor, Chartered Legal Executive etc.

JNlawyermum · 25/04/2020 22:04

It seems unlikely they have any legal qualification yet.

iMatter · 25/04/2020 22:07

I agree

Neither have any legal qualifications

Vickimf · 25/04/2020 23:53

Great thanks for all the replies.

I was just wondering if one was more qualified then the other. It’s nice to actually now have someone that seems interested in my case and actually replies.

OP posts:
user1487194234 · 26/04/2020 08:41

Shouldn't imagine it will make any difference
I would contact the firm and explain you are not happy with the service provided
I would always prefer to deal with a solicitor

Splodgetastic · 26/04/2020 08:58

They could be a legal executive, but they might not be and are probably a paralegal. Pre-litigation just means they deal with the cases before it gets to actually bringing court proceedings. I assume the firm divides things up like this because it deals mainly with high volume and lower value cases.

Splodgetastic · 26/04/2020 09:00

All litigated cases usually have to go through pre-action steps, so this is not unusual, I should add, and presumably you would rather it get settled than go to court (could be a massive assumption on my part!).

Vickimf · 26/04/2020 09:20

It’s been quite complicated to be honest I had an accident at work in 2018 fractured my knee on faulty flooring. There are 3 companies involved and they keep blaming each other so liability has not been admitted.

In 2019 I had to have knee surgery and earlier this year I had to go for a medical report and I now have to have another next year because the consultant thinks I will be left with lasting problems.

OP posts:
Jayfeem · 26/04/2020 19:05

Pre-lit sounds like they’re not legally qualified - although depending how the business operates the executive may not be legally qualified either. Glad they’re more helpful!

JNlawyermum · 26/04/2020 19:53

With multiple defendants and a complex long term knee injury, your case sounds serious and has potential to be high value. The issues between the defendants could ramp up the complexity. I would want a qualified lawyer running this type of case.

TriangleBingoBongo · 26/04/2020 19:56

They’re not qualified and probably equals.

Vickimf · 26/04/2020 20:16

Thanks for all of the replies I really appreciate it am expecting a phone call tomorrow so I will ask when a lawyer will become involved.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page