Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Legal matters

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

If there’s no legal limit on exercise in England why was a legal challenge necessary?

10 replies

CherryBakebadly · 14/04/2020 13:13

So the government has amended the national guidance to say you can exercise more in some situations (SEN, etc). Great. But. If the rules weren’t in law why did it need a legal challenge, can someone help me understand?

Wouldn’t that imply that when the government writes these rules they are writing binding law which is obviously not the case?

OP posts:
prh47bridge · 14/04/2020 15:52

A legal challenge may not have been necessary in this case since the government changed the guidance before the case got to court. It may be that representations to the government on behalf of those affected would have achieved the same result.

The fact that government guidance is not law does not prevent it being legally challenged. It is open to anyone to argue in court that the guidance breaches their human rights, for example.

YinuCeatleAyru · 14/04/2020 22:34

is there a news article link on this? not heard about this at all and haven't seen anything about it on bbc news or guardian.

CherryBakebadly · 15/04/2020 00:07

The fact that government guidance is not law does not prevent it being legally challenged. It is open to anyone to argue in court that the guidance breaches their human rights, for example.

Ah I see, that makes loads more sense now - thank you for explaining so clearly Smile

OP posts:
Aesopfable · 15/04/2020 00:15

Is it statutory guidance? If so then that should be treated as law.

CherryBakebadly · 15/04/2020 14:15

Don’t know what constitutes statutory guidance

OP posts:
slipperywhensparticus · 15/04/2020 14:17

I think it is law though? Part of the coronavirus act?

CherryBakebadly · 15/04/2020 16:25

No - that was my point! The once a day stipulation is not in the legislation, only in the guidance.

OP posts:
Collaborate · 15/04/2020 17:22

Because primary legislation cannot generally be challenged by judicial review, which is to deal with challenges to the government's exercise of its powers in circumstances where it is claimed that the government are acting unlawfully.

MarieG10 · 16/04/2020 07:52

The guidance is just that...advice. What matters ultimately is the law. The relevant sections are actually in the health regulations and not the Corona Virus act and last time I looked there was not a time limit on exercise. This is why the police are having such a hard time as they have tried to enforce guidance...which is not enforceable unless they themselves break the law.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page