Can anyone legal-minded please help me with something? Last year my abuser plead guilty to voyeurism and received a formal caution. I should have pushed for more but I was really struggling at the time and reporting him was about as much as I could manage, and the police response (although it started well) was upsetting, humiliating and ultimately disappointing. Whilst he received a formal caution he was not asked to sign the sex offenders register, as I was originally told he would be, and at the time I simply couldn't engage with it enough to enquire or push.
Does this sounds right? Can he have admitted to and received a conviction of sorts (the caution) for a sexual offence and not have had to sign the register? It's eating away at me that I didn't do enough, and that this isn't right. Surely it isn't right? Who can I approach in the world of law/policing to address this?
Thanks in advance.