Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Legal matters

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.

Ex trying to avoid paying maintenance by dealing soley in cash

29 replies

Heatherjayne1972 · 19/06/2016 17:54

Looks like my ex is dealing totally in cash to avoid paying tax or maintenance for our kids
He's already been in trouble with Hmrc for not dealing with his tax return
I am just beginning the divorce process so he thinks he's being clever by hiding his income
Can I do anything about it? Contact Hmrc or will it all come to light anyway when he has to complete form E.

Thoughts anyone??

OP posts:
ffon · 19/06/2016 21:08

Bumping.

Collaborate · 19/06/2016 23:06

It all depends on the evidence you have. Gather together now evidence of things bought but paid for by cash, e.g. holidays. It can be very hard to prove.

babybarrister · 20/06/2016 10:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LaPharisienne · 20/06/2016 10:29

If he is tax dodging, then reporting him to HMRC is the right thing to do.

Baby barrister, are you actually advising the OP to allow their XDP to dodge tax because it's in the OP's best (financial) interests? I presume you are not a practising lawyer...

Shock
babybarrister · 20/06/2016 12:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LaPharisienne · 20/06/2016 12:26

Wow.

babybarrister · 20/06/2016 13:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LaPharisienne · 20/06/2016 14:11

Yes - your clients. The OP is not your client therefore you don't owe her any duty - you therefore couldn't even argue that there is a conflict between your obligation to act in her best interests with your duties to uphold the rule of law and behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in you and in the provision of legal services.

I will now report this thread - presume you just weren't thinking. Sorry OP.

babybarrister · 20/06/2016 15:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Collaborate · 20/06/2016 15:21

LaPharisienne - you don't work for HMRC do you?

babybarrister has given proper advice to OP. It might not be in the best interests of tax-payers collectively, but people are still entitled to be advised based on what is best for them, provided they are not advised to break the law.

This is the Legal section, not AIBU.

Fourormore · 20/06/2016 15:32

Babybarrister has not advised the OP to do anything - merely pointed out what the consequences of reporting the ex to OP may be. The OP has no obligation to report her ex to HMRC in any case.

Spero · 20/06/2016 18:11

Another practising family lawyer here and I agree with babybarrister. It is sensible to get proper advice before you rush off and do anything. There is nothing inappropriate about that!

HopeArden · 20/06/2016 18:18

Really getting fed up of people running off and reporting threads because they've read something they don't like.

prh47bridge · 20/06/2016 18:49

Agree with Babybarrister and others.

There is no law requiring the OP to report her ex to HMRC. It is perfectly reasonable to advise her of the potential consequences of doing so. The OP can then make an informed decision. She would have every right to be upset if her lawyer didn't warn her and she ended up worse off as a result.

babybarrister · 20/06/2016 20:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LaPharisienne · 21/06/2016 21:02

No, don't work for HMRC.

Agree that the OP take advice - that's why I double checked in my first post that baby barrister was in fact advising the OP to ignore tax evasion because it was in her best interests.

To me, suggesting someone should ignore tax evasion because they may well profit from that evasion in the future or at the very least because acting to stop that evasion could harm their financial interests, does not uphold the rule of law or serve to maintain the trust the public places in the profession I.e. a conduct issue. I didn't report the thread because I disagreed with what baby barrister said - I'm sure s/he's correct about this being one potential outcome, I reported the thread because I think advice like this brings the profession into disrepute.

FWIW, advising a client of the range of potential outcomes from proposed action having understood the circumstances fully but allowing them to draw their own conclusions and decide on the best course of action having considered those outcomes would be entirely different, of course.

Spero · 22/06/2016 00:28

I did not read anything baby barrister said to be 'ignore tax evasion' .

What she said was 'get advice before you report it'. Which is entirely sensible.

i am glad you did not report this thread because there would seem to be utterly no need to do that.

HopeArden · 22/06/2016 07:34

In the real world people with children to feed and mortgages to pay have to consider their own financial position first. Prioritising hmrc's right to the money is a luxury a lot of women in this situation can't afford and imo getting proper child support is the first priority. Besides it is upto hmrc to track down tax avoiders.

JMKid · 23/06/2016 11:00

I personally would report him. I get no child maintenance at all because ex is claiming not to work, yet owns a non-registered business, all cash in hand and pays no tax, he does everything to avoid paying. If you are getting nothing or little anyway, it makes no difference financially to you the outcome.

BaboonBottom · 23/06/2016 11:10

He won't get far for long dealing in only cash.
He will struggle to get a mortgage / remortgage as he has no income
He will struggle to rent somewhere as he has no income
If he pays more than £4000 in to a bank it has to be reported to HMRC
If he tries to buy a car from a car dealer and pays more than £4000 in cash, it has to be reported

Yes he can go out and buy 'stuff' in cash but thats about it. It won't be long before he has to start doing something different. He can be investigated by HMRC as they will expect him to be earning or getting money from somewhere. He needs a few transactions for supermarkets, petrol etc to be on his bank statement.

I know this doesn't help with your should i report or not dilemma but what I'm trying to say is what ever you do, he can't sustain it for a long time anymore.

LaPharisienne · 23/06/2016 23:09

Spero if you read my first post, you'll see I double checked that baby barrister was advising the OP to ignore her X's tax dodging because it was in her financial interests. If you read her next post, you'll see she confirmed she was and that "all family lawyers" would advise the same. Hence my response.

prh47bridge · 23/06/2016 23:31

Her response was that all family lawyers would advise the OP to look before she leaps. No matter how often you repeat it that is NOT advising the OP to ignore her ex's tax dodging. It is simply advising her to consider the possible consequences of reporting her ex before deciding what to do.

LaPharisienne · 23/06/2016 23:50

Again, I asked specifically if she was advising the OP to allow her ex to tax dodge because it was in her financial interests. I therefore read her response as an answer that specific question.

Anyway - don't think we disagree that taking advice is sensible.

babybarrister · 24/06/2016 12:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

babybarrister · 24/06/2016 12:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Swipe left for the next trending thread